[Download pdf]

Authors

Danni Li, PhD, DABCC, FADLM
Department of Lab Medicine and Pathology
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, MN

Angela Ferguson, PhD, DABCC, FADLM
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Children’s Mercy Kansas City
Kansas City, MO

Mark A. Cervinski, PhD, DABCC, FADLM
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
Hanover, NH

Kara L. Lynch, PhD, DABCC, FADLM
Department of Laboratory Medicine
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, CA

Patrick B. Kyle, PhD, DABCC, FADLM
Department of Pathology
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, MS

Citation
Li D, Ferguson A, Cervinski MA, Lynch KL, Kyle PB. AACC guidance document on biotin interference in laboratory tests. [Epub] J Appl Lab Med January 13, 2020, as doi:10.1373/10.1093/jalm/jfz010.


Biotin (vitamin B7) is a coenzyme involved in multiple metabolic processes, including carbohydrate metabolism, fatty acid synthesis, amino acid catabolism, and gluconeogenesis (1). The Institute of Medicine recommends a daily biotin intake of 30 µg (2). Although the inclusion of biotin in over-the-counter multivitamins is common, biotin supplementation is not usually necessary because biotin is found in numerous foods (e.g., meat, fish, nuts, grains, eggs, and dairy products). High doses 35 of biotin (up to 3333 times the recommended daily dose [i.e., 100 000 µg or 100 mg]) are available over-the-counter and have been used for a variety of medical conditions, including diabetes, lipid disorders, biotinidase deficiency, carboxylase deficiencies, and peripheral neuropathy (3–5), as well as for hair, nail, and skin health (6, 7). Although no clinical evidence supports the use of high-dose biotin for beauty concerns, ongoing clinical trials have highlighted the potential therapeutic role of daily 300 mg biotin in slowing the morbidity associated with progressive and relapsing multiple sclerosis (8–12).

Biotin is also an essential reagent in biochemical applications. Its binding with avidin (e.g., streptavidin), one of the strongest noncovalent bonds, has been exploited in biochemical studies since the 1970s (13). Many laboratory tests that have been approved or cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are immunoassays that utilize biotin and streptavidin binding in the assay design (i.e., biotinylated immunoassays). Their strong binding is particularly useful for amplifying and isolating the assay readout, which increases the ability of the assay to detect lower quantities or concentrations of the analyte, decreases the number of steps required for analyte measurement, and allows for more rapid measurement of biomolecules of interest (14).

Normal circulating concentrations of biotin derived from the diet and normal metabolism are too low to interfere with biotinylated immunoassays. Biotin in over-the-counter multivitamins (doses up to 1 mg) has not been reported to cause immunoassay interference. However, ingestion of high-dose biotin supplements (e.g., ≥5 mg) results in significantly elevated blood concentrations that can interfere with commonly used biotinylated immunoassays. Evidence of interference has been described in case reports, in vivo studies (with study participants), and in vitro studies (biotin addition to mimic high blood concentrations), as described herein. In November 2017, the FDA released a Safety Communication warning the public that biotin supplementation may interfere with laboratory tests (15). The potential for biotin interference in some assays may be substantial, as one study determined that approximately 7% of emergency room patients exhibited circulating biotin concentrations >10 ng/mL (>40.9 nmol/L) (16).

Mechanisms of Biotin Interference

The mechanisms of biotin interference with biotinylated immunoassays can be explained in the context of how biotin and streptavidin binding is used in biotinylated assays. Immunoassays are generally categorized as either competitive or noncompetitive (sandwich). In general, streptavidin–biotin binding is used during assay incubation to couple biotinylated antibodies in sandwich immunoassays, or biotinylated antigens in competitive immunoassays, to streptavidin-coated magnetic surfaces (e.g., beads). When a biological specimen contains excess biotin, the biotin competes with the biotinylated antibodies or antigens for binding to the streptavidin-coated magnetic surfaces, resulting in reduced capture of the biotinylated antibodies or antigens. Excess biotin produces falsely low results in sandwich immuno- 65 assays because the assay signal is directly proportional to the analyte concentration. In competitive immunoassays, excess biotin causes falsely elevated results because the assay signal is inversely proportional to the analyte concentration. Specific details of biotin interference have been described extensively in other publications (17–27). Of note, excessive biotin in a blood sample is not likely to interfere with immunoassays that do not utilize biotin and streptavidin binding in the assay design or that utilize a streptavidin–biotin complex bound in reagents before incubation with blood samples.

Biotin Pharmacokinetics

Normal circulating concentrations of biotin typically range from 0.1 to 0.8 ng/mL in individuals consuming the recommended daily dose of 30 µg (28). Biotin is rapidly absorbed after ingestion and exhibits peak plasma concentrations within 1 to 2 hours (29, 30). Oral doses of 10 mg, equivalent to some of the highest doses in over-the-counter products, resulted in peak plasma concentrations ranging from 55 to 140 ng/mL (225–573 nmol/L) (29), whereas oral doses of 100 mg resulted in peak plasma concentrations ranging from 375 to 450 ng/mL (1535–1842 nmol/L) (11). The accumulation of biotin does occur, and sequential daily dosing revealed circulating concentrations twice as high on Day 7 compared with the same time point on Day 1 (29). Data analysis revealed that steady-state concentrations are reached after 3 days of constant biotin intake (29). Low concentrations of biotin are cleared quickly from the circulation of healthy individuals, with an elimination half-life of approximately 2 hours (30), whereas experiments with high doses indicate a half-life up to 18.8 hours (11). A pharmacokinetics study of apparently healthy individuals determined that blood concentrations can be expected to drop below 20 ng/mL (81.9 nmol/L) in 1, 5.5, 20, 108, and 146 hours after oral biotin doses of 1, 5, 10, 100, and 300 mg, respectively (29). However, delayed clearance and/or higher circulating concentrations of biotin may be observed in those with impaired renal function.

Summary of Case Reports

Case reports involving biotin interference in laboratory tests (Table 1) (19–27, 31–41) have been reported worldwide (United States, China, Europe, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and Middle Eastern countries) and may involve all ages (newborns to older adults) and genders. Treatments for multiple sclerosis and inborn errors of metabolism are the 2 most cited reasons for biotin ingestion in these published cases of interference. The majority of these cases involved biotin interference with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and other thyroid-function tests; the rest involved other endocrine tests, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), adrenocorticotropic hormone, prolactin, testosterone, and cortisol. In many of these case studies, biotin interference was confirmed by significant changes in the affected laboratory results when the patient stopped consuming biotin.

Summary of In Vivo Studies

A common strategy to investigate biotin interference with laboratory tests is to perform in vivo studies using a crossover study design in which blood specimens are collected from study participants before (baseline) and after biotin ingestion. Using this study design, Wijeratne et al.(34), Trambas et al. (42), Lim et al. (39), and Biscolla et al. (43) demonstrated that a single dose of biotin ingestion (e.g., 10–300 mg) in healthy volunteers can interfere with selected laboratory tests (e.g., free thyroxine [T4], free triiodothyronine [T3], thyroglobulin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate [DHEAS], estradiol, testosterone, ferritin, progesterone, vitamin B12, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], parathyroid hormone [PTH], luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH]). Li et al. (18) demonstrated that, among 6 healthy volunteers who took 10 mg of biotin per day for 7 days, biotin-associated interference was found in 9 of 23 biotinylated immunoassays by 3 manufacturers (Roche, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Siemens), including TSH, total T3, free T4, free T3, PTH, NT-proBNP, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The assays exhibited varying degrees of biotin interference among manufacturers.

Biotin is predominately eliminated in the urine, so the potential for interference in urine immunoassay tests is also of concern. To this end, Williams et al. (44) examined biotin interference in 7 different urine human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy tests and demonstrated that one test failed to develop a control line when tested with nonpregnant volunteers’ urine collected 2 to 4 hours after 10 mg biotin ingestion. This result was likely caused by interference with the process in which immobilized streptavidin binds to a biotinylated dye to display the control line.

Summary of In Vitro (Spiking) Studies

Although in vivo studies work well for analytes that are normally present in patient specimens, they are not effective for evaluating interference for analytes that are normally absent or are present only during certain physiologic conditions (e.g., human chorionic gonadotropin during pregnancy) or pathologic conditions (e.g., tumor markers during cancer). For these latter analytes, in vitro studies are more practical. In vitro studies have been performed to investigate biotin interference by measuring patient samples with known analyte concentrations after spiking with known quantities of biotin. Three general findings have been observed from these studies. First, the degree of biotin interference is directly related to the amount of biotin added to the specimen—that is, the higher the biotin concentration over the interference threshold, the more severe the interference. Second, a test may exhibit different degrees of biotin interference from one manufacturer to another, and this is consistent with in vivo studies (18). With biotin at 6 and 15 ng/mL (24.6 and 61.4 nmol/L), for example, in vitro studies of TSH immunoassays exhibited biotin-mediated negative interference of approximately 7% and 10% in Vitros 5600 (45) and Roche Elecsys (46), respectively, whereas 300 ng/mL (1228 nmol/L) biotin was required to produce a comparable effect in the Siemens Vista LOCI TSH immunoassay (47). Similarly, at 400 ng/mL biotin, the competitive Siemens LOCI and Roche Elecsys free T4 assays exhibited biotin-mediated positive biases of 26% and 1146%, respectively (46, 47). Third, the degree of biotin interference varies from one assay to the next within a particular manufacturer’s immunoassay platform. Willeman et al. demonstrated that a 45 biotin concentration of 400 ng/mL (1637 nmol/L) resulted in positive biases with the Siemens Vista LOCI competitive estradiol and free T3 immunoassays of 52% and 866%, respectively (47).

Literature findings on the effects of analyte concentrations on the magnitude of biotin interference are inconsistent. Meany et al. (31) demonstrated, for example, that the magnitude of biotin interference when present in concentrations between 5 and 160 ng/mL was independent of Roche Elecsys PTH levels (i.e., 33 and 487 ng/L). In contrast, Trambas et al. (46) demonstrated that 500 ng/mL biotin produced variable amounts of positive interference in the Roche Elecsys competitive estradiol immunoassay that ranged from 3428% down to 292% as the estradiol concentration was increased from 18 to 499 pmol/L. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because this study examined biotin at only a single concentration of 500 ng/mL (equivalent to blood concentrations observed 1–2 hours after ingestion of 100–300 mg biotin). Consequently, more comprehensive studies may be needed to investigate the effects of analyte concentration on the degree of biotin interference.

Recommendations from the FDA and In Vitro Diagnostic Test Manufacturers

FDA Recommendations

In its 2017 Safety Communication, the FDA issued comprehensive recommendations to consumers, healthcare providers, laboratory personnel, and lab-test manufacturers regarding biotin interference (15). These recommendations echoed those issued previously from manufacturers advocating increased communication among all parties about the ingestion of biotin and biotin-containing supplements before laboratory testing. The FDA reported an increased number of adverse events associated with biotin interference but, because of incomplete data, did not recommend a time frame to avoid biotin before specimen collection for laboratory tests. Given the wide variety and number of laboratory assays in use, the FDA recommended that clinical laboratories should contact assay manufacturers if they have questions about biotin interference. It was recommended that manufacturers use a minimum of 1200 ng/mL biotin to investigate potential interference and to determine the lowest concentrations of biotin that could cause clinically significant interference in their assays. The FDA did not provide specific guidance on interference thresholds deemed significant, but most manufacturers assign a ±10% deviation as the threshold for analytic significance.

Ideally, manufacturers will reformulate assays that are sensitive to biotin and will continue to offer customer support on this issue. This may involve the use of precomplexed antibodies or other mechanistic solutions. One manufacturer recently reformulated its TSH and troponin assays in direct response to concerns about biotin interference. Given that the timeline from initial assay design to reformulation and governmental approval requires months to years, laboratorians and clinicians will have to remain mindful of this issue for some time to come.

Manufacturer Recommendations

Diagnostic manufacturers have increased communications (e.g., informative bulletins, field safety notifications, package inserts, webinars, and websites) to laboratory personnel about the potential for biotin interference. For example, an informational bulletin published by Ortho Clinical Diagnostics indicated the possibility of biotin interference in some Vitros assays in specimens with biotin concentrations >2.4 ng/mL (>9.8 nmol/L) or those from individuals ingesting 300 µg/day. The company did not recommend a retrospective review of patient results to evaluate past interference from biotin. Instead, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics emphasized open communication between laboratories and clinicians to identify patients whose results may have been affected by biotin interference. Beckman Coulter issued a field safety notification to its customers that warned of biotin interference in only 4 assays (Access Total T3, Access Thyroglobulin, Access Free T4, and Access GI Monitor) at concentrations of >100 ng/ mL (>409 nmol/L). Roche Diagnostics performed a pharmacokinetics study (n = 54) involving doses of 5 and 10 mg biotin and found that circulating concentrations dropped below 30 ng/mL (122.8 nmol/L) in all participants after 3.5 and 8 hours, respectively (29). Based on these findings, Roche Diagnostics recommended that patients wait 8 hours before undergoing laboratory testing after consuming 5–10 mg doses of biotin (29). Siemens also informed its customers about the potential for biotin interference with select assays on the ADVIA Centaur, Immulite, Dimension EXL, and Dimension Vista. Table 2 summarizes biotin interference thresholds or degrees of biotin-mediated interference, as obtained from manufacturers’ package inserts, for many (but not all) immunoassay-based laboratory tests. The table is limited to the most common high-volume immunoassay platforms because it would be too time-consuming to evaluate all assays from all companies. Users should refer to manufacturers’ most recent package inserts because assay formulations may be updated and changed.

Recommendations to Laboratories and Clinicians

Laboratories, clinicians, and patients should increase communication regarding biotin interference with biotinylated immunoassay–based laboratory tests. Laboratories should determine which of their immunoassays may be affected by biotin interference and educate clinicians about the findings. Communication may be accomplished several ways, including the use of formal memos and laboratory bulletins and participation in conferences and clinical rounds. Laboratories should also seek to inform patients of the potential for biotin interference with laboratory test results. Methods could involve the use of placards in outpatient phlebotomy centers, with information on biotin use. Healthcare systems could include questions about the use of biotin and nutritional supplements during the inpatient/outpatient registration process. Clinicians could query patients about their use of food supplements and explain the relevance. Electronic health records could be updated to display an alert to clinicians at the time of test order whenever tests with known biotin interference are ordered. Clinicians should contact the laboratory when laboratory results do not fit the patient’s clinical picture or if the patient is known to have consumed a dose of biotin >5 mg (48, 49). Because hundreds or thousands of specimens may pass through a laboratory each day, laboratory personnel often rely on clinician feedback to help identify issues with test results.

Laboratories may use various methods to verify suspected biotin interference, including use of a specimen diluent for the assay (50), removal of excess biotin via streptavidin-coated beads (51), and biotin quantification via chromatography (LC-MS/ MS) or other procedure. Ideally, a specimen suspected of biotin interference should be analyzed with a different assay that does not use biotin in its format (49, 50). Alternatively, the laboratory may request a new specimen after the patient has abstained from biotin for a time. It is recommended that patients who have consumed 5–10 mg biotin wait a minimum of 8 hours before having blood collected for laboratory tests (29, 40, 49). Longer washout periods, up to 72 hours, may be required to prevent interference in assays with interference thresholds <30 ng/mL (<122.8 nmol/L) (29). Unless medically contraindicated, patients being prescribed a high-dose biotin therapy (≥100 mg/day) should abstain from biotin for a minimum of 72 hours before blood collection (9, 47, 52). Keep in mind that those with renal impairment may exhibit higher circulating biotin concentrations and prolonged elimination rates. Reporting patient results after dilution or biotin removal is not recommended unless the procedure has been validated by the laboratory (49, 52, 53).

Summary

The recent increase in the use of high-dose biotin supplements requires laboratorians and clinicians to be mindful of the potential for biotin interference in biotinylated immunoassay-based laboratory tests. Laboratories, clinicians, regulators, and patients should work together to ensure accurate laboratory results. Laboratories have several options for identifying suspected biotin interference in specimens. Alternatively, the relatively fast elimination of biotin allows the potential for rapid follow-up specimen analysis if necessary.

References

  1. Zempleni J, Mock D. Biotin biochemistry and human requirements. J Nutr Biochem 1999; 10:128–38.
  2. Institute of Medicine (US) Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1998.
  3. Fernandez-Mejia C. Pharmacological effects of biotin. J Nutr Biochem 2005; 16:424–7.
  4. Zempleni J, Hassan YI, Wijeratne SS. Biotin and biotinidase deficiency. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2008; 3:715–24.
  5. Koutsikos D, Agroyannis B, Tzanatos-Exarchou H. Biotin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Biomed Pharmacother 1990; 44:511–4.
  6. Soleymani T, Lo KS, Shapiro J. The infatuation with biotin supplementation is there truth behind its rising popularity? A comparative analysis of clinical efficacy versus social popularity. J Drugs Dermatol 2017;16: 496–500.
  7. Lipner SR. Rethinking biotin therapy for hair, nail, and skin disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 78:1236–8.
  8. Sedel F, Bernard D, Mock DM, Tourbah A. Targeting demyelination and virtual hypoxia with high-dose biotin as a treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuropharmacology 2016; 110:644–53.
  9. Sedel F, Papeix C, Bellanger A, Touitou V, Lebrun-Frenay C, Galanaud D, et al. High doses of biotin in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015; 4:159–69.
  10. Tourbah A, Lebrun-Frenay C, Edan G, Clanet M, Papeix C, Vukusic S, et al. Md1003 (high-dose biotin) for the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mult Scler 2016; 22:1719–31.
  11. Peyro Saint Paul L, Debruyne D, Bernard D, Mock DM, Defer GL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of md1003 (high-dose biotin) in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016; 12:327–44.
  12. Tourbah A, Gout O, Vighetto A, Deburghgraeve V, Pelletier J, Papeix C, et al. Md1003 (high-dose pharmaceutical-grade biotin) for the treatment of chronic visual loss related to optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. CNS Drugs 2018; 32:661–72.
  13. Wilchek M, Bayer EA. The avidin-biotin complex in bioanalytical applications. Anal Biochem 1988; 171:1–32.
  14. Diamandis EP, Christopoulos TK. The biotin-(strept) avidin system: principles and applications in biotechnology. Clin Chem 1991; 37:625–36.
  15. The FDA warns that biotin may interfere with lab tests: FDA safety communication. https://www.fda.gov/ medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm586505.htm (Accessed May 2019).
  16. Katzman BM, Lueke A J, Donato LJ, Jaffe AS, Baumann NA. Prevalence of biotin supplement usage in outpatients and plasma biotin concentrations in patients presenting to the emergency department. Clin Biochem 2018;60: 11–6.
  17. Samarasinghe S, Meah F, Singh V, Basit A, Emanuele N, Emanuele MA, et al. Biotin interference with routine clinical immunoassays: understand the causes and mitigate the risks. Endocr Pract 2017; 23:989–98.
  18. Li D, Radulescu A, Shrestha RT, Root M, Karger AB, Killeen AA, et al. Association of biotin ingestion with performance of hormone and nonhormone assays in healthy adults. JAMA 2017; 318:1150–60.
  19. Al-Salameh A, Becquemont L, Brailly-Tabard S, Aubourg P, Chanson P. A somewhat bizarre case of Graves’ disease due to vitamin treatment. J Endocr Soc 2017; 1:431–5.
  20. Barbesino G. Misdiagnosis of Graves’ disease with apparent severe hyperthyroidism in a patient taking biotin megadoses. Thyroid 2016; 26:860–3.
  21. Bülow Pedersen I, Laurberg P. Biochemical hyperthyroidism in a newborn baby caused by assay interaction from biotin intake. Eur Thyroid J 2016;5: 212–5.
  22. De Roeck Y, Philipse E, Twickler TB, Van Gaal L. Misdiagnosis of Graves’ hyperthyroidism due to therapeutic biotin intervention. Acta Clin Belg 2018;73: 372–6.
  23. Evans N, Yates J, Tobin J, McGill J, Huynh T. Immunoassay interference secondary to therapeutic high-dose biotin: a paediatric case report. J Paediatr Child Health 2018;54: 572–5.
  24. Koehler VF, Mann U, Nassour A, Mann WA. Fake news? Biotin interference in thyroid immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 2018; 484:320–2.
  25. Minkovsky A, Lee MN, Dowlatshahi M, Angell TE, Mahrokhian LS, Petrides AK, et al. High-dose biotin treatment for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis may interfere with thyroid assays. AACE Clin Case Rep 2016;2: e370–e373.
  26. Stieglitz HM, Korpi-Steiner N, Katzman B, Mersereau JE, Styner M. Suspected testosterone-producing tumor in a patient taking biotin supplements. J Endocr Soc 2018;2: 563–9.
  27. Waghray A, Milas M, Nyalakonda K, Siperstein A. Falsely low parathyroid hormone secondary to biotin interference: a case series. Endocr Pract 2013; 19:451–5.
  28. Livaniou E, Evangelatos GP, Ithakissios DS, Yatzidis H, Koutsicos DC. Serum biotin levels in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Nephron 1987; 46:331–2.
  29. Grimsey P, Frey N, Bendig G, Zitzler J, Lorenz O, Kasapic D, Zaugg CE. Population pharmacokinetics of exogenous biotin and the relationship between biotin serum levels and in vitro immunoassay interference. Int J Pharmacokinet 2017; 2:247–56.
  30. Bitsch R, Salz I, Hötzel D. Studies on bioavailability of oral biotin doses for humans. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 1989;59: 65–71.
  31. Meany DL, Jan de Beur SM, Bill MJ, Sokoll LJ. A case of renal osteodystrophy with unexpected serum intact parathyroid hormone concentrations. Clin Chem 2009; 55:1737–9.
  32. Henry JG, Sobki S, Arafat N. Interference by biotin therapy on measurement of TSH and FT4 by enzyme immunoassay on Boehringer Mannheim ES700 analyser. Ann Clin Biochem 1996;33:162–3.
  33. Kwok JS, Chan IH, Chan MH. Biotin interference on TSH and free thyroid hormone measurement. Pathology 2012; 44:278–80.
  34. Wijeratne NG, Doery JC, Lu ZX. Positive and negative interference in immunoassays following biotin ingestion: a pharmacokinetic study. Pathology 2012; 44:674–5.
  35. Elston MS, Sehgal S, Du Toit S, Yarndley T, Conaglen JV. Factitious Graves’ disease due to biotin immunoassay interference-a case and review of the literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:3251–5.
  36. Batista MC, Ferreira CE, Faulhaber AC, Hidal JT, Lottenberg SA, Mangueira CL. Biotin interference in immunoassays mimicking subclinical Graves’ disease and hyperestrogenism: a case series. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55: e99–e103.
  37. Kummer S, Hermsen D, Distelmaier F. Biotin treatment mimicking Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:704–6.
  38. Cusini C, Sassi L, De Paola G, Piantanida E. Apparent biochemical thyrotoxicosis due to assay interference by high-dose biotin given for multiple sclerosis. J Endocrinol Invest 2017; 40:889–90.
  39. Lim SK, Pilon A, Guéchot J. Biotin interferes with free thyroid hormone and thyroglobulin, but not TSH measurements using Beckman-access immunoassays. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2017;78:186–7.
  40. Willeman T, Casez O, Faure P. Biotin in multiple sclerosis and false biological hyperthyroidism: mind the interference. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2017; 173:173–4.
  41. Sharma A, Baumann NA, Shah P. Biotin-induced biochemical Graves’ disease: a teachable moment. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177:571–2.
  42. Trambas CM, Sikaris KA, Lu ZX. More on biotin treatment mimicking Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1698.
  43. Biscolla RPM, Chiamolera MI, Kanashiro I, Maciel RM, Vieira JG. A single 10 mg oral dose of biotin interferes with thyroid function tests. Thyroid 2017; 27:1099–100.
  44. Williams GR, Cervinski MA, Nerenz RD. Assessment of biotin interference with qualitative point-of-care hCG test devices. Clin Biochem 2018; 53:168–70.
  45. Ali M, Rajapakshe D, Cao L, Devaraj S. Discordant analytical results caused by biotin interference on diagnostic immunoassays in a pediatric hospital. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2017; 47:638–40.
  46. Trambas C, Lu Z, Yen T, Sikaris K. Characterization of the scope and magnitude of biotin interference in susceptible Roche Elecsys competitive and sandwich immunoassays. Ann Clin BioChem 2018; 55:205–15.
  47. Willeman T, Casez O, Faure P, Gauchez AS. Evaluation of biotin interference on immunoassays: new data for troponin I, digoxin, NT-pro-BNP, and progesterone. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55: e226–e229.
  48. Sulaiman RA. Biotin treatment causing erroneous immunoassay results: a word of caution for clinicians. DD&T 2016; 10:338–9.
  49. Chun KY. Biotin interference in diagnostic tests. Clin Chem 2017; 63:619–20.
  50. Gifford JL, Sadrzadeh SH, Naugler C. Biotin interference: underrecognized patient safety risk in laboratory testing. Can Fam Physician 2018;64:370.
  51. Trambas C, Lu Z, Yen T, Sikaris K. Depletion of biotin using streptavidin-coated microparticles: a validated solution to the problem of biotin interference in streptavidin–biotin immunoassays. Ann Clin Biochem 2018; 55:216–26.
  52. Lam L, Kyle CV. A simple method to detect biotin interference on immunoassays. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55: e104–6.
  53. Piketty ML, Prie D, Sedel F, Bernard D, Hercend C, Chanson P, Souberbielle JC. High-dose biotin therapy leading to false biochemical endocrine profiles: validation of a simple method to overcome biotin interference. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017; 55:817–25.

Table 1. Case reports involving biotin interference in laboratory tests

Author

Country

No. of cases

Age

Sex

History/diagnosis

Dose/day, mg

Reason for biotin use

Misdiagnosis

Henry et al. (32)

Saudi Arabia

1

1 day

Fa

NR

10

Organic acidemia

Graves disease

Meany et al. (31)

USA

1

64 years

F

CKD

5

Restless leg syndrome

Hypopara­thyroidism

Kowk et al. (33)

China

1

3 years

F

Propionic acidemia

10

Metabolic disorder

Graves disease

Wijeratne et al. (34)

Australia

1

1 week

NR

Metabolic disorder

30

Lactic acidosis, liver failure

Graves disease

Waghray et al. (27)

USA

2

60-62 years

F

CKD

1.5-5.0

Hair growth and neuropathy

Hyperpara­thyroidism

Barbesino et al. (20)

USA

1

55 years

M

MS

300

MS

Graves disease

Elston et al. (35)

New Zealand

1

63 years

F

MS

300

MS

Graves disease

Kummer et al. (37)

Germany

6

<18 years

NR

Metabolic disorder

2-5b

Metabolic disorder

Graves disease

Minkovsky et al. (25)

USA

1

74 years

F

MS

300

MS

Graves disease

Bülow Pedersen and Laurberg (21)

Denmark

1

1 day

F

Newborn failure to thrive

5

Biotinidase deficiency, family history

Graves disease

Al-Salameh et al. (19)

France

1

32 years

M

X-linked adrenomyelo­neuropathy

100

X-linked adrenomyelo­neuropathy

Graves disease

Batista et al. (36)

Brazil

1

NR

NR

NR

5-300

Hair and nail growth

Graves disease, hyper­estrogenism

Cusini et al. (38)

Italy

1

69 years

F

MS

300

MS

Graves disease

Lim et al. (39)

France

2

NR

NR

MS

300

MS

Graves disease

Sharma et al. (41)

USA

1

60 years

NR

NR

10

NR

Graves disease

Willeman et al. (40)

France

1

39 years

M

MS

>0.05

MS

Graves disease

De Roeck et al. (22)

Belgium

1

NR

NR

MS

300

MS

Graves disease

Evans et al. (23)

Australia

1

15 months

M

Mitochondrial disorder

15

Mitochondrial disorder

Graves disease

Koehler et al. (24)

Germany

1

47 years

M

MS

300

MS

Graves disease

Stieglitz et al. (26)

USA

1

48 years

F

Palpitations, inability to lose weight

5

Hair and nail growth

Graves disease, testosterone-secreting tumor

Most cases involved interference with TSH and other thyroid-function tests. Biotin consumption indicated as total amount ingested per day.

a F, female; NR, not reported; CKD, chronic kidney disease; M, male; MS, multiple sclerosis.

b Dose in mg/kg.

Table 2. Interference thresholds for biotin-mediated interference as obtained from manufacturers’ assay package inserts

Assay, instrument

Direction of error

Interference threshold, ng/mL

Manufacturer: Beckman Coulter Inc.

GI Monitor (CA 19-9), Access

Decrease

>25

Thyroglobulin, Access

Decrease

>10

Thyroglobulin Antibody II, Acccess

Decrease

>100

Total Thyroxine (T4), Access

Increase

>10

Free Triiodothyronine (T3), Access

Increase

>10

Total T3, Access

Increase

>1.0

Manufacturer: Ortho Clinical Diagnostics

AFP, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Anti-HAV IgM, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Anti-HAV Total, Vitros

Increase

>10

bHCG, Total II, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Cancer Antigen 125, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Cancer Antigen 15-3, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Cancer Antigen 19-9, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), Vitros

Decrease

>10

CK-MB, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Cortisol, Vitros

Increase

>10

Estradiol, Vitros

Increase

>5

Ferritin, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Folate, Vitros

Increase

>10

Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Insulin, Vitros

Decrease

>160

Luteinizing Hormone, Vitros

Decrease

>5

Myoglobin, Vitros

Decrease

>20

NT-proBNP, Vitros

Decrease

>20

Parathyroid Hormone, Intact, Vitros

Decrease

>5

Progesterone, Vitros

Increase

>20

Prolactin, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), Vitros

Decrease

>10

Testosterone, Vitros

Increase

>10

Troponin I ES, Vitros

Decrease

>10

Vitamin B12, Vitros

Increase

>20

25-Hydroxyvitamin D, Vitros

Increase

>15
 

Manufacturer: Roche Diagnostics

AFP α1-fetoprotein

Decrease

>60

ACTH, Elecsys

Decrease

>70

Anti-HAV IgM

Decrease

>50

Anti-TPO

Increase

>10

Anti-Thyroglobulin, Elecsys

Increase

>60

Anti-TSH Receptor, Elecsys

Increase

>10

Anti-HBc IgM

Decrease

>100

Anti-HCV

Decrease

>50

C-Peptide

Decrease

>60

Cancer Antigen 125 II

Decrease

>35

Cancer Antigen 15-3 II

Decrease

>320

Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9

Decrease

>100

Calcitonin, Elecsys

Decrease

>40

Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)

Decrease

>120

Cortisol II

Increase

>30

Creatine Kinase MB

Decrease

>30

Anti-CCP

Decrease

>70

DHEA-S

Increase

>70

Estradiol III, Elecsys

Increase

>36

Folate III

Increase

>21

Free T4 II, Elecsys

Increase

>20

Free T3 III, Elecsys

Increase

>70

FSH, Elecsys

Decrease

>60

HCG STAT

Decrease

>40

HCG+B, Elecsys

Decrease

>80

Hepatitis B Antigen, Elecsys

Decrease

>40

Hepatitis B Core Antibody, Elecsys

Increase

>30

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

Decrease

>44

Human Epididymal Protein 4

Decrease

>50

Human Growth Hormone

Decrease

>30

IGF-1, Elecsys

Decrease

>50

Immunoglobulin E

Decrease

>100

Insulin, Elecsys

Decrease

>60

Luteinizing Hormone, Elecsys

Decrease

>50

Myoglobin

Decrease

>50

Myoglobin STAT

Decrease

>50

N-MID Osteocalcin, Elecsys

Decrease

>50

Parathyroid Hormone, Elecsys

Decrease

>50

Parathyroid Hormone STAT, Elecsys

Decrease

>50

NT-proBNP II

Decrease

>30

NT-proBNP II STAT

Decrease

>30

Procalcitonin, BRAHMS Elecsys

Decrease

>30

Progesterone III, Elecsys

Increase

>30

Prolactin II, Elecsys

Decrease

>40

PSA Total, Elecsys

Decrease

>60

Sex Hormone Binding Globulin, Elecsys

Decrease

>70

Triiodothyronine (T3), Elecsys

Increase

>10

Testosterone II, Elecsys

Increase

>30

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Elecsys

Decrease

>1200

Thyroxine (T4), Elecsys

Increase

>100

Troponin I, Elecsys

Decrease

>30

Troponin T

Decrease

>50

Troponin T STAT

Decrease

>50

Troponin T STAT Gen.5 (reformulated)

Decrease

>1200

Vitamin B12, Elecsys

Increase

>50

25-Hydroxyvitamin D

Increase

>70

Vitamin D Total II, Elecsys

Increase

>30

Manufacturer: Siemens

B-type Natriuretic Peptide, Centaur

Decrease

>250

Cyclosporine, Centaur

Increase

>75

DHEAS, Centaur

Increase

>25

Folate, Centaur

Increase

>50

HAV IgM, Centaur

Decrease

>500

HAVT, Centaur

Increase

>25

HBc IgM, Centaur

Decrease

>150

Sex Hormone Binding Globulin, Centaur

Decrease

>250

Testosterone II, Centar

Increase

>50

Troponin I Ultra, Centaur

Decrease

>20

B-type Natriuretic Peptide, Dimension EXL

Decrease

>250

Folate, Dimension EXL

Increase

>250

Free T3, Dimension EXL

Increase

>100

Free T4L, Dimension EXL

Increase

>100

Troponin I, Dimension EXL

Decrease

>100

TSHL, Dimension EXL

Decrease

>250

Vitamin B12, Dimension EXL

Increase

>100

Vitamin D, Dimension EXL

Increase

>500

AFP, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>1000

CA125, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>500

CA19-9, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>500

manufacturer Siemens continued

CEA, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>500

CTNI, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>100

Digoxin, Dimension Vista

Increase

>500

Estradiol (E2), Dimension Vista

Increase

>250

Ferritin, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>500

Folate, Dimension Vista

Increase

>250

FSH, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>500

Free T3, Dimension Vista

Increase

>50

Free T4, Dimension Vista

Increase

>250

Luteinizing Hormone, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>1200

MMB, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>250

PBNP, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>250

Progesterone, Dimension Vista

Increase

>100

Prolactin, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>500

SIRO, Dimension

Decrease

>500

Troponin I, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>100

TSH, Dimension Vista

Decrease

>100

Vitamin B12, Dimension Vista

Increase

>100

BR-MA (CA 15-3), Immulite 1000

Decrease

>100

CEA, Immulite 1000

Increase

>9

CKMB, Immulite 1000

Decrease

>2

EPO, Immulite 1000

Decrease

>5

Gastrin, Immulite 1000

Decrease

>2

OM-MA (CA125), Immulite 1000

Increase

>2

Thyroglobulin, Immulite 1000

Decrease

>5

Vitamin B12, Immulite 1000

Increase

>250

Allergen specific IgG4, Immulite 2000

Decrease

>250

BR-MA (CA 15-3), Immulite 2000

Decrease

>100

3gAllergy Specific IgE, Immulite 2000

Decrease

>5

Anti HBc, Immulite 2000

Decrease

>5

CEA, Immulite 2000

Increase

>2

CKMB, Immulite 2000

Decrease

>5

EPO, Immulite 2000

Decrease

>2

Folic Acid, Immulite 2000

Increase

>1000

Gastrin, Immulite 2000

Decrease

>2

OM-MA (CA125), Immulite 2000

Increase

>5

Thyroglobulin, Immulite 2000

Decrease

>5
 

Data are not all inclusive and do not contain information on all laboratory tests. The data are presented as reported by individual manufacturers at the time of this writing. To convert ng/mL to nmol/L, multiply ng/mL by 4.093.

Nonstandard abbreviations TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; PTH, parathyroid hormone; T4, thyroxine; T3, triiodothyronine

Author Contributions
All authors confirmed they have contributed to the intellectual content of this paper and have met the following 4 requirements: (a) significant contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting or revising the article for intellectual content; (c) final approval of the published article; and (d) agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the article thus ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the article are appropriately investigated and resolved.
D. Li, financial support, provision of study material or patients.

Authors’ Disclosures or Potential Conflicts of Interest
Upon manuscript submission, all authors completed the author disclosure form. Disclosures and/or potential conflicts of interest:

Employment or Leadership: P.B. Kyle, AACC Academy Council.
Consultant or Advisory Role: None declared.
Stock Ownership: None declared.
Honoraria: D. Li, Abbott Diagnostics, Diasorin; P.B. Kyle, AACC.
Research Funding: None declared.
Expert Testimony: None declared.
Patents: None declared.
Other Remuneration: D. Li, Abbott Diagnostics, Diasorin.
Role of Sponsor: No sponsor was declared.