AACC uses Cookies to ensure the best website experience. Continuing without changing Cookie settings assumes you consent to our use of cookies on this device. You can change these settings at any time, but that may impair functionality on our websites. Review our cookie and privacy policy

CD/DVD

Patient-Focused Laboratory Quality?The Fundamentals: 1. Understanding Quality

 	 Patient-Focused Laboratory Quality—The Fundamentals: 1. Understanding Quality
  • Copyright: 2014

Price: $75.00

Member Price: $75.00

Rating: Member Average

This introductory course focuses on how lab results impact patient care, what can cause 'bad' results and how well-designed QC processes detect changes before 'bad' results are reported.

After successful completion, you will be able to describe, practice, and demonstrate competence to:

  • Categorize changes in method accuracy or precision as "clinically-significant" change that may cause patient harm or "clinically-insignificant" change that does not impact clinical decision making.
  • Use a lookup table to predict the % of results expected to fall within or beyond specified SD limits of the mean-- on a Gaussian curve and Q.C. chart.
  • Describe why Q.C. Charts are limited to the detection of changes in accuracy or precision; why they do not assess method bias, or ability to meet performance standards.
  • Relate clinical consequences to patients to method errors with Accuracy, Precision, Reference intervals, Reportable Ranges, Specificity, and Sensitivity.
  • List clinical consequences of false positive or false negative patient results (too far below or above their true value to be clinically meaningful).
  • Use a Q.C. Simulator to model the impact of changes in method accuracy or precision.
  • Create case studies to illustrate why a 2-SD shift always looks the same on the QC chart but may be a change for the better or it may create clinically-unacceptable results.
  • Identify patterns on Q.C. charts as changes in accuracy or precision.
  • Describe probable causes of changes in method accuracy or precision.
  • Use simple math you can do in your head to calculate bias and total error.
  • Compare Total Error to TEa Limits to assess ability of methods to meet performance standards and acceptability to report patient results.